Firm Compared With "Industry" - Printable Version +- Accountancy Forum (https://www.accountancy.com.pk/forum) +-- Forum: The Profession (https://www.accountancy.com.pk/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Forum: Firms (https://www.accountancy.com.pk/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=11) +--- Thread: Firm Compared With "Industry" (/showthread.php?tid=1460) |
Firm Compared With "Industry" - Arslan - 12-25-2004 Hello. All What do u ppl think after ACCA shall we opt for Articleship In A firm -- supposidely like 4 Roads.---- Or should we join an Industry-- Like In a firm we will Really Gain Expereince with 2500 Rs/Month. And In An Industry Like Packages we could earn a starting Salary of 20000- With a good Rate Of growth. Now Situation After 3 Years. Who will be more demanded an ACCA who has Completed articleship In a firm or an ACCA with 3 years expereince from an Industry.---- Anothere Option--- WHo will earn more SALARY a) A student who has Completed 3 yrs expereince from a Firm alongside CA (Extraordianry Case) b) A student who has gained 3 yrs Relevant Expereince from an Industry along with CIMA. Ur Views wll relly be appreciated. - n/a6 - 12-26-2004 I think that in order to become a sucessful Accountant every one should pass through the ordeal of firm. But otherwise The recommendation of Industry Is also worth considering. - maani - 12-26-2004 Definitely in Pakistan option "a" will earn a lot more than "b" Ace - n/a6 - 12-27-2004 Like Already mentioned.. Every Accountant should pass through the ordeal of firm. As already regerred Opt For Optimisation rather thean Maximisation.. B y passing through that ordeal u will be devoleped to that Extent that u will become a sona from Kundan..... So Option A will be better.... Others Views.... «·´`·.(*·.¸(`·.¸ ¸.·´)¸.·*).·´`·» «.......... S w a l a t ..........» «·´`·.(¸.·*(¸.·´ `·.¸)*·.¸).·´`·» - Arslan - 12-28-2004 Thanks for ur reply. But what abt the opinion of the other senior Members of this forum... - the_farhan - 12-29-2004 <font face='Verdana'> dear mr. Arslan, u ve actually propounded FOUR distinct cases #1 ACCA + 3 yrs articleship from a firm. #2 ACCA + 3 years expereince from Industry. #3 ACCA + ACA (articles will be definitely from a firm bcoz of ACA). #4 ACMA(CIMA,UK)+ 3 yrs experience from industry. preferred rating in descending order shall be 1- option#3 ACCA + ACA 2- option#4 ACMA(CIMA,UK) + industry (by the way, CIMA prefers industrial exposure over articles from audit firm) 3- ACCA + articles from firm 4- ACCA + experience from industry </font id='Verdana'> FARHAN live, n let live ... - n/a6 - 12-29-2004 <BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial" id=quote>quote<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>2- option#4 ACMA(CIMA,UK) + industry (by the way, CIMA prefers industrial exposure over articles from audit firm) 3- ACCA + articles from firm <hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial" size=2 id=quote> So by it r u giving CIMA preference over ACCA...... I think CIMA or ACCA both along with there articles completed will be of equal demand..... Or will CIMA qualifed will earn more... ur views....... «·´`·.(*·.¸(`·.¸ ¸.·´)¸.·*).·´`·» «.......... S w a l a t ..........» «·´`·.(¸.·*(¸.·´ `·.¸)*·.¸).·´`·» - the_farhan - 12-31-2004 <font face='Verdana'> salaaam all, dear swalat, these r my neutral n unbiassed views. i m not rating CIMA better or poorer thn ACCA. this is a separate debate. articles r not compulsory for either of CIAM or ACCA. both bodies accept industrial experience also. i prefer ACCA with articles rather thn industry bcoz articles give more comprehensive command over auditing n taxation etc. thn does the industry. however, CIMA prefers industrial, rather thn firm's, experience. i was told this by CIMA authorities on e-mail. </font id='Verdana'> FARHAN live, n let live ... - n/a6 - 12-31-2004 <BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial" id=quote>quote<hr height=1 noshade id=quote> CIMA prefers industrial, rather thn firm's, experience. i was told this by CIMA authorities on e-mail. <hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial" size=2 id=quote> Thanks for this peice of information....... «·´`·.(*·.¸(`·.¸ ¸.·´)¸.·*).·´`·» «.......... S w a l a t ..........» «·´`·.(¸.·*(¸.·´ `·.¸)*·.¸).·´`·» |