05-20-2003, 05:51 AM
<img src=icon_smile_big.gif border=0 align=middle>
one reason probably why 'the one' is so averse to the idea is probably cause he cant public his identity, cuz whatever he has said 'bout ICAP and calling certain people 'vultures', they definitely will attract 'disciplinery actions' (if he's connected with ICAP, I think he is)
I dont like this idea either, cause whatever u say here is 'written evidence' and sometimes u might right something that is 'discreditable to a member of the institute' <img src=icon_smile.gif border=0 align=middle> , even otherwise for eg. there was this discussion 'rate firms' so if theres some one who rates AFF as top, and he's in practice and in AFF (although everybody says and almost believes that AFF is at top, I dont) then he could be subject to disciplinary actions etc.... so I plan to continue to enjoy my anonymity....... and for u 'the one' be careful pal <img src=icon_smile_big.gif border=0 align=middle>
one reason probably why 'the one' is so averse to the idea is probably cause he cant public his identity, cuz whatever he has said 'bout ICAP and calling certain people 'vultures', they definitely will attract 'disciplinery actions' (if he's connected with ICAP, I think he is)
I dont like this idea either, cause whatever u say here is 'written evidence' and sometimes u might right something that is 'discreditable to a member of the institute' <img src=icon_smile.gif border=0 align=middle> , even otherwise for eg. there was this discussion 'rate firms' so if theres some one who rates AFF as top, and he's in practice and in AFF (although everybody says and almost believes that AFF is at top, I dont) then he could be subject to disciplinary actions etc.... so I plan to continue to enjoy my anonymity....... and for u 'the one' be careful pal <img src=icon_smile_big.gif border=0 align=middle>