02-12-2005, 11:45 PM
Azeem u are good at narrating. But perhaps you should copy/paste the quote into word and then compose your reply there. Then copy/paste it back into your browser and use the "Preview Post" to examine what you have. Repeat as needed.
1) I agree with ur style of discussion. If people insult others intelligence by making dishonest or stupid posts then they have already broken the pact of civility. I usually let them get away with it once or twice and letting them know that they are being dishonest. If they persist well then they get as good as they give.
Posted By Bilal to Azeem
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">LAstly,ur statements are contradicting.own one hand u say that employer dont see marks percentage once u have acca degree,they only see aptitude,knowledge etc and on the other hand u say that marks can be used to speclize in particular subject.speclization can be done in ACCA PASSED papers but once u have passed ca no speclization is required.e.g if u have passed corporate law paper of module E,it means u have studied the whole ordinance,its rules,and there are round about 10 or more laws in this paper.after going through all this what further u can study ,i just dont know.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
And
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">As far as specilization is concerned,once u pass papers like Advanced accounting,advanced auditing,corporate law,advanced taxation,management accounting etc of icap i can assure u with guarantee that ur knowledge is equal to,if not greater,to a person who has a phd degree in any of the above subjects.i mean,if u have studied all the IAS AND ISA and all the corporate laws,what else left to be read.
bilal<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
2) I read this as a request to not be bullied into silence. I have no power to stop you from posting. The only power I have is to comment on stupid or dishonest posts. There is nothing stopping you from making better posts. If your knowledge is questioned the best strategy is to start asking questions yourself. If you are right it will become clear and if you are wrong then you increase the odds or learning something. If you make claims to knowledge that you do not posses then that is dishonest. If it is clear that your dishonest claims are being questioned then there is a good chance that the person questioning them knows more than you. This could be your lucky day because it is very easy to turn the tables and force that person to give you a free education.
3) This is a dishonest argument. If a person uses only slurs and personal attacks then I agree with you. But if there is reasoned argument and deceptive practices are revealed and pointed out then this is not an attack. People can be dishonest and stupid but they have no right to think that they can continuously be dishonest and stupid in public and not hear about it. At some point someone has to call a liar a liar. Someone has to call a fraud a fraud and someone has to call stupidity stupid. The values of political correctness can be taken to extremes to where stupidity, lying and fraud are now correct. People who plead that their stupidities and lies not be pointed out are simply asking for the same recognition of lies and stupidities as honesty and intelligence. People are allowed to be stupid they are not allowed to pass that off as intelligence. People can be dishonest but they should not expect a free pass.
---------------------------------------------
If I could... Then I would... Turn back time!!
1) I agree with ur style of discussion. If people insult others intelligence by making dishonest or stupid posts then they have already broken the pact of civility. I usually let them get away with it once or twice and letting them know that they are being dishonest. If they persist well then they get as good as they give.
Posted By Bilal to Azeem
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">LAstly,ur statements are contradicting.own one hand u say that employer dont see marks percentage once u have acca degree,they only see aptitude,knowledge etc and on the other hand u say that marks can be used to speclize in particular subject.speclization can be done in ACCA PASSED papers but once u have passed ca no speclization is required.e.g if u have passed corporate law paper of module E,it means u have studied the whole ordinance,its rules,and there are round about 10 or more laws in this paper.after going through all this what further u can study ,i just dont know.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
And
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">As far as specilization is concerned,once u pass papers like Advanced accounting,advanced auditing,corporate law,advanced taxation,management accounting etc of icap i can assure u with guarantee that ur knowledge is equal to,if not greater,to a person who has a phd degree in any of the above subjects.i mean,if u have studied all the IAS AND ISA and all the corporate laws,what else left to be read.
bilal<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
2) I read this as a request to not be bullied into silence. I have no power to stop you from posting. The only power I have is to comment on stupid or dishonest posts. There is nothing stopping you from making better posts. If your knowledge is questioned the best strategy is to start asking questions yourself. If you are right it will become clear and if you are wrong then you increase the odds or learning something. If you make claims to knowledge that you do not posses then that is dishonest. If it is clear that your dishonest claims are being questioned then there is a good chance that the person questioning them knows more than you. This could be your lucky day because it is very easy to turn the tables and force that person to give you a free education.
3) This is a dishonest argument. If a person uses only slurs and personal attacks then I agree with you. But if there is reasoned argument and deceptive practices are revealed and pointed out then this is not an attack. People can be dishonest and stupid but they have no right to think that they can continuously be dishonest and stupid in public and not hear about it. At some point someone has to call a liar a liar. Someone has to call a fraud a fraud and someone has to call stupidity stupid. The values of political correctness can be taken to extremes to where stupidity, lying and fraud are now correct. People who plead that their stupidities and lies not be pointed out are simply asking for the same recognition of lies and stupidities as honesty and intelligence. People are allowed to be stupid they are not allowed to pass that off as intelligence. People can be dishonest but they should not expect a free pass.
---------------------------------------------
If I could... Then I would... Turn back time!!