08-28-2005, 01:38 AM
why the hell u should start a topic if u dont have tolerence?
~O~N~E~
~O~N~E~
08-28-2005, 01:38 AM
why the hell u should start a topic if u dont have tolerence?
~O~N~E~
08-28-2005, 08:53 AM
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by lion_king</i>
<br />hahahahah..... what a funny thread nobody knows the history..........the reality is kashmir is a part of india and also pakistan.....azad kashmir is ours while makbuza jammu and kashmir is that of india................................... now answer to the second question regarding maharaja of kashmir he was the oner of the land and he decided to join india........here i should remove one misconception that government is not the owner of the land its only to run the land ........sir u r saying that living in this age but the age of maharja was a totally different senerio......at his time the maharaja was the sole owner of the land and he could do anything to his land........... third and most important.........it was the foolishness on our behalf .......we were hoping at the time of partition that the state of hyderabad would join pakistan ......hyderabad was a very big and fertile state..........it had hindu majority while the ruler was a muslim .....he first choosed to live independently and later joined pakistan but india saying that it had a hindu population attacked it ........ and thus we gained not a single state................. these princly states were given an option that the maharaja/nawab/walee would decide the future of his state either to join india or pakistan please make it clear it was the ruler of these states who was given the option and not the ppl of his state <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"> Well, Hyderabad did go to India (even if it was after a couple of years) and the first Governer general of India and ex Viceroy of British India - Lord Mountbatten said that the Nizam of Hyderabad must have kept the wishes of the people in mind before acession. I think the same must then be the case for Kashmir as well ! I wonder, how different things would have been had Jinnah lived another decade, Kashmir and Hyderabad were still ''in limbo'' until September 1948. But some things are just not meant to be !
08-28-2005, 08:55 AM
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by naam_thegreat</i>
<br />why the hell u should start a topic if u dont have tolerence? ~O~N~E~ <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"> Listen pal, check your own posts first than criticise others.......... as for as Kashmir is concern, in my opinion Kashmiri people should be given a chance to decided for their fate..... Again i repeat that in UNO it was held that Kashmiri people will decide for their fate therefore, all other arguments (maharaja was owner of whole land etc) are immaterial. Sajjad
08-30-2005, 11:17 PM
well, what u people are discussing yaar. Azad kashmir is ours and Maqbooza is India's any problem with that?
Ibri
09-21-2005, 07:41 AM
<font color="orange"> HEY !!!!!!!
In which world do u EXIST ??? does it matters wht we think ??? .<b>.. the issue of Kashmir will not be solved in a thousand yr ........... </b> y do i think so India is not willing to declare kashmir as a free state n the QUESTION of leting Kashmir be a part of pk is ................ .. so asi fazool conversations ka kya fidha . aik hi baat ha kernay ko kya ?????????? </font id="orange"> ---------------------------------------------------------------<font face="Courier New"><font size="1"><b> Y is the WorLd so full of ..........FOOLs ?????? n y am I one of them ( []</font id="size1"></b></font id="Courier New">
09-23-2005, 07:29 AM
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Sahar_M</i>
<br /><font color="orange"> HEY !!!!!!! In which world do u EXIST ??? does it matters wht we think ??? .<b>.. the issue of Kashmir will not be solved in a thousand yr ........... </b> y do i think so India is not willing to declare kashmir as a free state n the QUESTION of leting Kashmir be a part of pk is ................ .. so asi fazool conversations ka kya fidha . aik hi baat ha kernay ko kya ?????????? </font id="orange"> <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"> I care to differ, its easy for you to say that the issue of Kashmir will not resolve for a thousand years ! Think of the suffering Kashmiris and perhaps you'd wish for a shorter time period. It may be a difficult issue, but let's hope for the best. The way things are in I think we will see some sort of resolution to the issue in our life times...
09-23-2005, 06:19 PM
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Pracs</i>
<br /><blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Sahar_M</i> <br /><font color="orange"> HEY !!!!!!! In which world do u EXIST ??? does it matters wht we think ??? .<b>.. the issue of Kashmir will not be solved in a thousand yr ........... </b> y do i think so India is not willing to declare kashmir as a free state n the QUESTION of leting Kashmir be a part of pk is ................ .. so asi fazool conversations ka kya fidha . aik hi baat ha kernay ko kya ?????????? </font id="orange"> <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"> I care to differ, its easy for you to say that the issue of Kashmir will not resolve for a thousand years ! Think of the suffering Kashmiris and perhaps you'd wish for a shorter time period. It may be a difficult issue, but let's hope for the best. The way things are in I think we will see some sort of resolution to the issue in our life times... <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"> Pracs, how do you think this issue can be resolved? My knowledge of the situation is bare, but from my understanding there is little political action in any meeting in the middle, the people of Kashmir have thus far not been allowed to vote on the issue. Also, on a different point, in your post you suggest the rape, killings are done by one side. Again from my understanding it is both sides who are a party to this. I think it is the people who actually live in that situation that suffer, and not either India/ Pakistan. From the resources to be found in Kashmir, it is plain that neither side is prepared to allow that to the other side, do you think there is room for compromise? -------------------------- See Ya -) Visit www.accountancystudents.co.uk
09-24-2005, 02:09 AM
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by label</i>
I care to differ, its easy for you to say that the issue of Kashmir will not resolve for a thousand years ! Think of the suffering Kashmiris and perhaps you'd wish for a shorter time period. It may be a difficult issue, but let's hope for the best. The way things are in I think we will see some sort of resolution to the issue in our life times... <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"> yeah inshallh i also hope for the best but still u simply cant ignore the facts. the non muslims arent willing to give muslims there rights, kishmir , bossina n palstine r all fighting. therfore , i see less chances of a brighter future for us muslims untill the arrival of HAZrat ISAH (PBUH). ---------------------------------------------------------------<font face="Courier New"><font size="1"><b> Y is the WorLd so full of ..........FOOLs ?????? n y am I one of them ( []</font id="size1"></b></font id="Courier New"> |
|