03-30-2009, 05:05 AM
Dear Khalid
Donât mind about the writer of words âbackground musicâ and âdisorder reboundâ, as use of such low category words prove "mentality" âdisorderâ of mistakes proofed fellow. All members can see use of such low category words on all the threads of this forum, and against each of the member who simply did not accept views of mistakes proofed fellow.
Here he commits another personal disgrace to you and me both by writing âyou have full right to make this disorder 'rebound' like other ethically sound fellows.â, but when I would point out this personal disgrace of both of us, then he would bring more lame excuses.
Even though you addressed your posts to me and did not write any low category personal comments but you saw words like âbackground musicâ and âdisorderâ. If other members point out such words, then he replies with âlike to be treated likelyâ etc. Members can see that even you did not use any low category word against him but still words like âbackground musicâ and âdisorder reboundâ were used to hit you and me personally. So, can someone tell why did he use these words here? I know he would reply that such words are linked to some past events, but still the question here is, who has given him this right to write such low category words against other members? Canât he use some other alternative words? He specifically selects and uses such words to ridicule against other members and then gives the decision that other members deserved those words. Same is the case on each thread on this forum where posters refused to accept his ideas. There he says, because people keep ârubbingâ their words, so he gets the automatic legal right to use such low category words against them. By the way, who has given him such automatic legal right to use such low category words against members?
This is how he claims that he âhandlesâ the situation on this forum. In the thread he himself referred earlier and as per his own words, âthis forum knows I can handle such situations very well.â Posted - Sep 18 2008 52310 of thread <http//www.accountancy.com.pk/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=6286&whichpage=1>
So, leave this kind of handling of situation to him and let him prove his level, and âmentalityâ âdisorderâ with the use of such low category words. Readers can draw a pen picture of him with the words he uses and open threats he gives to other members.
Regards
Donât mind about the writer of words âbackground musicâ and âdisorder reboundâ, as use of such low category words prove "mentality" âdisorderâ of mistakes proofed fellow. All members can see use of such low category words on all the threads of this forum, and against each of the member who simply did not accept views of mistakes proofed fellow.
Here he commits another personal disgrace to you and me both by writing âyou have full right to make this disorder 'rebound' like other ethically sound fellows.â, but when I would point out this personal disgrace of both of us, then he would bring more lame excuses.
Even though you addressed your posts to me and did not write any low category personal comments but you saw words like âbackground musicâ and âdisorderâ. If other members point out such words, then he replies with âlike to be treated likelyâ etc. Members can see that even you did not use any low category word against him but still words like âbackground musicâ and âdisorder reboundâ were used to hit you and me personally. So, can someone tell why did he use these words here? I know he would reply that such words are linked to some past events, but still the question here is, who has given him this right to write such low category words against other members? Canât he use some other alternative words? He specifically selects and uses such words to ridicule against other members and then gives the decision that other members deserved those words. Same is the case on each thread on this forum where posters refused to accept his ideas. There he says, because people keep ârubbingâ their words, so he gets the automatic legal right to use such low category words against them. By the way, who has given him such automatic legal right to use such low category words against members?
This is how he claims that he âhandlesâ the situation on this forum. In the thread he himself referred earlier and as per his own words, âthis forum knows I can handle such situations very well.â Posted - Sep 18 2008 52310 of thread <http//www.accountancy.com.pk/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=6286&whichpage=1>
So, leave this kind of handling of situation to him and let him prove his level, and âmentalityâ âdisorderâ with the use of such low category words. Readers can draw a pen picture of him with the words he uses and open threats he gives to other members.
Regards