03-30-2009, 08:16 AM
Dears,
The post stating that every future comment of mine would be personal and malign is nothing else but "hore choopo" state of mind. I guess people must be knowing the hilarious tale I am referring.
Let me clear, this was about some sardars who were inherited a piece of land that was left uncultivated. Due to some crises they decided to cultivate some crop. Upon discussion it was agreed to sow sugarcane. Now one of sardar so 'wisely' pointed out the 'threat' that the inhabitants of nearby village will eat all the sugarcanes and nothing would be left behind. The 'wise' sardars decided to deal with the 'threat' and attacked the people of that village. While the fight was on peak someone asked, what was their fault. The 'wise' sardar replied, hore choopo saadey ganney'.(Do eat our sugarcane).
The reader forgot seeing that I wrote I will not stop positive work and replying the wrong ideas floated here regardless of whatever it takes. The attention was called since a similar rebounding was already threatened by innocent fellow that he had not been replying to keep the things calm and now he will leave no stone unturned.
Saying that the other man did not address me in his post and thus should have not been replied is weird. Here normally posts are not addressed in person. The message which these carry decides what should be replied and what not. Similar thing was done by the man who was replied but that did not come into sight. Similar thing was done when Dr Kurt's quotation is objected. I mean this is strange controvercy.This suggests the level of double standards people carry.
To all irrelated ones I again inform that the quotation was made with permission from Richebacher Letter, if any one is affected, he can confirm directly. Otherwise he would be personally reponsible to whatever reply he will get now onward so one should keep his mouth shut since it is merely a personal attack. I mean this is peak of "hat dharmi". You posted an objection, I told you should not, you kept on bluffing, I confirmed I carry the permission so you can confirm directly if your interests have been affected, though it is logically sufficient when I have given the clarification. Still, instead of doing the thing which can remove your whims you are repeating same thing. I mean this is ridiculous on the part of ones who are singing the saga of ethics. Is there anything left to prove what you are and what mentality you carry.
Any theft involving copy rights affects the one whose material is copied. If he is a person and has died, it affects his heirs and his organization. Even otherwise if it is questionable it is to be done by law enforcers. I wonder how people assume their roles without analyzing their position, status, rights and obligations.
Say, if it stands their social obligation to report such fault, why they are not doing so? Is not it strange? I mean are not they becoming part of this crime by ignoring it or keeping it within the boundries of this thread? If they are, then they must be indirect partners in such crime. If not, then why they are crying? It's strange.
I must say people should revisit their "mushla maar gaya" strategy and diplomacy so that the very purpose of this forum may not be ruined.
Regards,
Kamran.
The post stating that every future comment of mine would be personal and malign is nothing else but "hore choopo" state of mind. I guess people must be knowing the hilarious tale I am referring.
Let me clear, this was about some sardars who were inherited a piece of land that was left uncultivated. Due to some crises they decided to cultivate some crop. Upon discussion it was agreed to sow sugarcane. Now one of sardar so 'wisely' pointed out the 'threat' that the inhabitants of nearby village will eat all the sugarcanes and nothing would be left behind. The 'wise' sardars decided to deal with the 'threat' and attacked the people of that village. While the fight was on peak someone asked, what was their fault. The 'wise' sardar replied, hore choopo saadey ganney'.(Do eat our sugarcane).
The reader forgot seeing that I wrote I will not stop positive work and replying the wrong ideas floated here regardless of whatever it takes. The attention was called since a similar rebounding was already threatened by innocent fellow that he had not been replying to keep the things calm and now he will leave no stone unturned.
Saying that the other man did not address me in his post and thus should have not been replied is weird. Here normally posts are not addressed in person. The message which these carry decides what should be replied and what not. Similar thing was done by the man who was replied but that did not come into sight. Similar thing was done when Dr Kurt's quotation is objected. I mean this is strange controvercy.This suggests the level of double standards people carry.
To all irrelated ones I again inform that the quotation was made with permission from Richebacher Letter, if any one is affected, he can confirm directly. Otherwise he would be personally reponsible to whatever reply he will get now onward so one should keep his mouth shut since it is merely a personal attack. I mean this is peak of "hat dharmi". You posted an objection, I told you should not, you kept on bluffing, I confirmed I carry the permission so you can confirm directly if your interests have been affected, though it is logically sufficient when I have given the clarification. Still, instead of doing the thing which can remove your whims you are repeating same thing. I mean this is ridiculous on the part of ones who are singing the saga of ethics. Is there anything left to prove what you are and what mentality you carry.
Any theft involving copy rights affects the one whose material is copied. If he is a person and has died, it affects his heirs and his organization. Even otherwise if it is questionable it is to be done by law enforcers. I wonder how people assume their roles without analyzing their position, status, rights and obligations.
Say, if it stands their social obligation to report such fault, why they are not doing so? Is not it strange? I mean are not they becoming part of this crime by ignoring it or keeping it within the boundries of this thread? If they are, then they must be indirect partners in such crime. If not, then why they are crying? It's strange.
I must say people should revisit their "mushla maar gaya" strategy and diplomacy so that the very purpose of this forum may not be ruined.
Regards,
Kamran.