04-03-2009, 07:47 PM
Dears,
My above posts are sufficient to show the face of a member which can help making appropriate conclusions about him. The man in question has failed to provide any clarification or answer so far and is just beating about the bush. His fakeness has been brought before every one visiting this thread. There could only be two possibilities which I analyze hereunder
Firstly, if he is "Khalid Naseem Sipra" (as he used to write "Khalid Sipra") then he is liar and everything he posted is to be considered fake, as Khalid Naseem Sipra qualified ACCA in December 2008 session and is an ACCA affiliate so far. He can't be the member of ACCA by any means even now and also in 2006 when he was a student. We may not forget that this man used to write ACCA with his name in 2006, which designation one cannot use without being member of ACCA. I wonder if it is not discreditable under ACCA rules to use designation ACCA while they were not even qualified and were poor struggling students in the capacity of "LITTLE BOYS", having "LITTLE MIND" and "LITTLE BRAIN". I offer my apologies to other ACCA students but these words were necessary since these were originally used by him for a student of ACCA.
Secondly, if he is not "Khalid Naseem Sipra" and is using the fake ID "Khalid Sipra" which has a greatest similarity with the actual name of an ACCA affiliate (qualified in 2008 December) then there are three issues. At first, he is indirectly defaming the name of original person which some how "by chance" is also from Pakistan, settled at Greenwich U.K. and is also "by chance" into ACCA. (What a great deal of similarities. It speaks something). Further, if he is not an ACCA member and was not an ACCA member in 2006 (although if we assume he is not Khalid Nasem Sipra) it is wrong to write ACCA with his name. Furthermore, writing ACCA with a fake name (that has great resemblance with the name of another ACCA affiliate) and declaring such membership to every one on a public forum is immoral.
I wonder if there is any other possibility. Readers can judge it well!!!
He calls Rabia a third class citizen, which in fact is the fault of a Government, but I wonder if he is first class citizen of the country where he resides. Some one from UK can throw light on it. I know it since there are lot of my loved ones including friends at UK. Other things said about Rabia are too ridiculous to be discussed. She is like a sister for most of the members of this forum including this fake man by virtue of the religion. I know explaining him anything moral bears no effect. I confirm by pointing out above, I am not preaching the religion which I may be doing elsewhere. I don't object but I wonder why Admin provides this man such a great amount of leverage on using such language. Here even he himself is not being criticized for being little or old, or short or tall, or whitish or fair, or British or Pakistani etc (the words used in one of above paragraphs are copied from his own post to make him understand). These have nothing to do with the discussion going on. He should mind it that others can come up with such analysis as well and may hit below the belt by ridiculously discussing personal background, family members and everything. One should understand what I am saying. I know it would be ridiculous, prohibited and is by no mean a way to deal the matters. I request Admin to take action at least on such words. If some one is justified he should answer the questions. It's not a personal issue like the forgoing ones, since it relates to misrepresentations on a public forum. We should place both the things separate otherwise his acts can bounce back to him.
It's wrong if some one assumes, he is the only advocate of ethics. I mean one may be among them but there could be others as well, so taking it specifically is not justified at least at this point of time and on this thread. If he feels I said only to him I request him to note the explanation. Since some one has asked not to call him in question, I confirm he was not called and he will not be called. I hope things can settle now to that extent. The referral of the matter to Admin is my pleasure and I have no objection on it.
Just to confirm, I let the readers know that I do understand the difference between "accused" and "criminal". Also with a confirmation that I am not referring it to any one specifically (either directly or indirectly), I point out that all the criminals are always accompanied by lawyers during the stage they are called "accused". This does not make lawyers the criminal or accused. At the end of the day "accused" has to become "criminal" if things get proved. I also mention my understanding that this forum is not a court of justice. Pointing out some wrong acts done here is aimed at to save the readers from misrepresentations. I know people can take their decisions but misrepresentation can always affect.
I would look forward to have any justified reply to the so called "rubbish" matter of "Khalid Naseem Sipra" a recent ACCA qualified and ACCA affiliate. As far as "pleasures on peoples direct confirmation from ACCA and Khalid Naseem Sipra" are concerned these may vanish soon. ACCA can be requested to post a message to the Admin of this forum to stop the fake misrepresentation provided this man is not original one. I may not be doing so personally.
I received telephonic call from a much respected friend, who is also the forum member and an ACCA member, that, to save the future of this man, such matter may not be taken to ACCA. Since my friend is a very kind person and I always feel a great deal of respect and honour, I promised that this will not be done by me at least. If some one else will be doing so, I cannot stop. Therefore, I may request that this issue should be justifiably clarified to save every one from going to that length.
Regards,
KAMRAN.
My above posts are sufficient to show the face of a member which can help making appropriate conclusions about him. The man in question has failed to provide any clarification or answer so far and is just beating about the bush. His fakeness has been brought before every one visiting this thread. There could only be two possibilities which I analyze hereunder
Firstly, if he is "Khalid Naseem Sipra" (as he used to write "Khalid Sipra") then he is liar and everything he posted is to be considered fake, as Khalid Naseem Sipra qualified ACCA in December 2008 session and is an ACCA affiliate so far. He can't be the member of ACCA by any means even now and also in 2006 when he was a student. We may not forget that this man used to write ACCA with his name in 2006, which designation one cannot use without being member of ACCA. I wonder if it is not discreditable under ACCA rules to use designation ACCA while they were not even qualified and were poor struggling students in the capacity of "LITTLE BOYS", having "LITTLE MIND" and "LITTLE BRAIN". I offer my apologies to other ACCA students but these words were necessary since these were originally used by him for a student of ACCA.
Secondly, if he is not "Khalid Naseem Sipra" and is using the fake ID "Khalid Sipra" which has a greatest similarity with the actual name of an ACCA affiliate (qualified in 2008 December) then there are three issues. At first, he is indirectly defaming the name of original person which some how "by chance" is also from Pakistan, settled at Greenwich U.K. and is also "by chance" into ACCA. (What a great deal of similarities. It speaks something). Further, if he is not an ACCA member and was not an ACCA member in 2006 (although if we assume he is not Khalid Nasem Sipra) it is wrong to write ACCA with his name. Furthermore, writing ACCA with a fake name (that has great resemblance with the name of another ACCA affiliate) and declaring such membership to every one on a public forum is immoral.
I wonder if there is any other possibility. Readers can judge it well!!!
He calls Rabia a third class citizen, which in fact is the fault of a Government, but I wonder if he is first class citizen of the country where he resides. Some one from UK can throw light on it. I know it since there are lot of my loved ones including friends at UK. Other things said about Rabia are too ridiculous to be discussed. She is like a sister for most of the members of this forum including this fake man by virtue of the religion. I know explaining him anything moral bears no effect. I confirm by pointing out above, I am not preaching the religion which I may be doing elsewhere. I don't object but I wonder why Admin provides this man such a great amount of leverage on using such language. Here even he himself is not being criticized for being little or old, or short or tall, or whitish or fair, or British or Pakistani etc (the words used in one of above paragraphs are copied from his own post to make him understand). These have nothing to do with the discussion going on. He should mind it that others can come up with such analysis as well and may hit below the belt by ridiculously discussing personal background, family members and everything. One should understand what I am saying. I know it would be ridiculous, prohibited and is by no mean a way to deal the matters. I request Admin to take action at least on such words. If some one is justified he should answer the questions. It's not a personal issue like the forgoing ones, since it relates to misrepresentations on a public forum. We should place both the things separate otherwise his acts can bounce back to him.
It's wrong if some one assumes, he is the only advocate of ethics. I mean one may be among them but there could be others as well, so taking it specifically is not justified at least at this point of time and on this thread. If he feels I said only to him I request him to note the explanation. Since some one has asked not to call him in question, I confirm he was not called and he will not be called. I hope things can settle now to that extent. The referral of the matter to Admin is my pleasure and I have no objection on it.
Just to confirm, I let the readers know that I do understand the difference between "accused" and "criminal". Also with a confirmation that I am not referring it to any one specifically (either directly or indirectly), I point out that all the criminals are always accompanied by lawyers during the stage they are called "accused". This does not make lawyers the criminal or accused. At the end of the day "accused" has to become "criminal" if things get proved. I also mention my understanding that this forum is not a court of justice. Pointing out some wrong acts done here is aimed at to save the readers from misrepresentations. I know people can take their decisions but misrepresentation can always affect.
I would look forward to have any justified reply to the so called "rubbish" matter of "Khalid Naseem Sipra" a recent ACCA qualified and ACCA affiliate. As far as "pleasures on peoples direct confirmation from ACCA and Khalid Naseem Sipra" are concerned these may vanish soon. ACCA can be requested to post a message to the Admin of this forum to stop the fake misrepresentation provided this man is not original one. I may not be doing so personally.
I received telephonic call from a much respected friend, who is also the forum member and an ACCA member, that, to save the future of this man, such matter may not be taken to ACCA. Since my friend is a very kind person and I always feel a great deal of respect and honour, I promised that this will not be done by me at least. If some one else will be doing so, I cannot stop. Therefore, I may request that this issue should be justifiably clarified to save every one from going to that length.
Regards,
KAMRAN.