01-09-2005, 01:59 AM
<font face='Verdana'>
shoaib akhtar is just a speed deamon, nothing more thn tht. just give him a touch n the ball shall cross the boundary. good batesmen exploit his speed (recall australian batesmen, they do just tht). his head is off, just wanting to bowl 100 mph, caring damn for yielding 100 runs even. his record shows tht he has not played three matches in a row. he always pulls his hamstring (sorry for incorrect spelling). O god, somebody tell him tht line n length r the only key to gettiong wickets, speed has nothing to do with it. if it were the case, then shane warne n muralitharen shud get not a single wicket!! bret lee, the counter part of shoaib in terms of speed, maintains his line n length n so i prefer him over shabeee.
</font id='Verdana'>
FARHAN
live, n let live ...
shoaib akhtar is just a speed deamon, nothing more thn tht. just give him a touch n the ball shall cross the boundary. good batesmen exploit his speed (recall australian batesmen, they do just tht). his head is off, just wanting to bowl 100 mph, caring damn for yielding 100 runs even. his record shows tht he has not played three matches in a row. he always pulls his hamstring (sorry for incorrect spelling). O god, somebody tell him tht line n length r the only key to gettiong wickets, speed has nothing to do with it. if it were the case, then shane warne n muralitharen shud get not a single wicket!! bret lee, the counter part of shoaib in terms of speed, maintains his line n length n so i prefer him over shabeee.
</font id='Verdana'>
FARHAN
live, n let live ...
