05-02-2006, 03:52 PM
<font color="blue">
[P]..
yeah thts an accounant point of view ,,n if i ant mistaken thts called random samplying (hit n trial method,, gud for chking of errors). but i would still say tht ur sample size is very inappropriate .. theres no logic behind it they r simply based on ppl who cared to mention there dob's,, , we can come to many other conclusion frm it as well ⦠like â¦. The highest % tht choose to reply are born in april .. ************ ,, just choose 32 ppl n conclude stuff on its base. WOW!!!!!
N y didnt any one else object.. hello didnât praces object ???
Oh! I didnât take time to notice tht I wasnât born in april .. ofcourse I wasnât ,, otherwise y would I be objecting on the sample size. [P]
khar wht eva ur stactistics proves ,, exceptions do exist n I shall like to be the exception [
] no hard feeling [D]</font id="blue">
[P]..
yeah thts an accounant point of view ,,n if i ant mistaken thts called random samplying (hit n trial method,, gud for chking of errors). but i would still say tht ur sample size is very inappropriate .. theres no logic behind it they r simply based on ppl who cared to mention there dob's,, , we can come to many other conclusion frm it as well ⦠like â¦. The highest % tht choose to reply are born in april .. ************ ,, just choose 32 ppl n conclude stuff on its base. WOW!!!!!
N y didnt any one else object.. hello didnât praces object ???
Oh! I didnât take time to notice tht I wasnât born in april .. ofcourse I wasnât ,, otherwise y would I be objecting on the sample size. [P]
khar wht eva ur stactistics proves ,, exceptions do exist n I shall like to be the exception [
] no hard feeling [D]</font id="blue">
