03-28-2005, 05:30 AM
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by abdulmajid</i>
<br />aha khan, you want to punch and then expect me to stand silent. that's not fair, mate.
you have accused me of making fun with religious issues, would you like to mention, which religious issue and how i have? it's a serious accusation, believe me.
ok, if i am not aware(lol) of something, would u like to create awareness on this forum about that thing. otherwise it will be safe to conclude that it's actually you who is ignorant. and what u have written in the end <blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">Should you have genuine queries, ask the way QUESTIONS are asked.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
interesting. you are funny khhan.
inta habieba omri, malikta omri
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
Now you are trying fruitleslly to critisize Azeem. Let me clear you my point first regarding lying sack of Sh-it .
If it is claimed that someone is X and there is no evidence to back up that claim then the original claim is a fallacious argument. But if there is evidence then it is not. And it doesn't matter if X == brilliant, X == silly or X == dishonest. That is not a fallacious argument. Ad Hominem is an argument with no evidence simply accusations. I am not making an Ad Hominem argument. When a case is brought to court for fraud they are not making Ad Hominem arguments if they have evidence to back up their claims. If people do not want to be called liars then they need to make sure that they don't lie to people. They need to be honest. It has been my experience that when cheaters know that they can get away with cheating, they cheat. It is only when people call them on it that they realize that they canât get away with it and at least for interactions with that person they do not cheat. Liars are in that category. Calling them on their lying is what should be done. Letting them get away with their lies is what has gotten this country into this mess. When the President can make national statements that the jury is still out on evolution he is liar as well but no one will call him on it. But if I had the chance I certainly would. And of course, he lies because it is his ignorance about religion that makes him dishonest the same is the problem with you. Dear you are ignorant about the religion Islam.
---------------------------------------------
âLittle minds are tamed and subdued by misfortune; but great minds rise above it.â
<br />aha khan, you want to punch and then expect me to stand silent. that's not fair, mate.
you have accused me of making fun with religious issues, would you like to mention, which religious issue and how i have? it's a serious accusation, believe me.
ok, if i am not aware(lol) of something, would u like to create awareness on this forum about that thing. otherwise it will be safe to conclude that it's actually you who is ignorant. and what u have written in the end <blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">Should you have genuine queries, ask the way QUESTIONS are asked.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
interesting. you are funny khhan.
inta habieba omri, malikta omri
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
Now you are trying fruitleslly to critisize Azeem. Let me clear you my point first regarding lying sack of Sh-it .
If it is claimed that someone is X and there is no evidence to back up that claim then the original claim is a fallacious argument. But if there is evidence then it is not. And it doesn't matter if X == brilliant, X == silly or X == dishonest. That is not a fallacious argument. Ad Hominem is an argument with no evidence simply accusations. I am not making an Ad Hominem argument. When a case is brought to court for fraud they are not making Ad Hominem arguments if they have evidence to back up their claims. If people do not want to be called liars then they need to make sure that they don't lie to people. They need to be honest. It has been my experience that when cheaters know that they can get away with cheating, they cheat. It is only when people call them on it that they realize that they canât get away with it and at least for interactions with that person they do not cheat. Liars are in that category. Calling them on their lying is what should be done. Letting them get away with their lies is what has gotten this country into this mess. When the President can make national statements that the jury is still out on evolution he is liar as well but no one will call him on it. But if I had the chance I certainly would. And of course, he lies because it is his ignorance about religion that makes him dishonest the same is the problem with you. Dear you are ignorant about the religion Islam.
---------------------------------------------
âLittle minds are tamed and subdued by misfortune; but great minds rise above it.â
