04-21-2006, 06:54 AM
sportyspice,
im quite in agreement wid u....bt i tend to differ-monetary terms are certainly one of the major factors in judging qualifications, but i think that CAs r more professionally trained dan an MBA and i believe CA is a detailed and thorough stdy whereas MBA is like icing on the top of nothing....i dun say its fake.....but juss dont find real complacency or satisfaction in dat very profession....
and secondly i dun mean to inferiorate ne qualification bt juss clearifyin Y i honour an ICAP's CA.....as for actuarials....its a real gud qualification but wid a couple f drawbaks despite much money dere!
dat is ....it mostly revolves around the insurance industry..thus limiting ure scope to only 1 area and secondly in our very society...i prefer avoiding a career in an insurance firm ....
kher just an idea ....and xactly, nor do I mean to be offensive!
EVERY1 has his own views afterall....
r0k!!!
im quite in agreement wid u....bt i tend to differ-monetary terms are certainly one of the major factors in judging qualifications, but i think that CAs r more professionally trained dan an MBA and i believe CA is a detailed and thorough stdy whereas MBA is like icing on the top of nothing....i dun say its fake.....but juss dont find real complacency or satisfaction in dat very profession....
and secondly i dun mean to inferiorate ne qualification bt juss clearifyin Y i honour an ICAP's CA.....as for actuarials....its a real gud qualification but wid a couple f drawbaks despite much money dere!
dat is ....it mostly revolves around the insurance industry..thus limiting ure scope to only 1 area and secondly in our very society...i prefer avoiding a career in an insurance firm ....
kher just an idea ....and xactly, nor do I mean to be offensive!
EVERY1 has his own views afterall....
r0k!!!
