09-15-2006, 02:28 AM
Usman I have to disagree with you.
Undoubtedly CA is tougher of the two.
Don't just look at CA Inter's syllabus isolately, when you combine this with professional syllabus, then CA is perhaps as dynamic as any other course and much more dynamic than ACCA.
ACCA student may be are performing as good as CA student in firms, some b. comers are also.
I heard it a lot of times that ACCA syllabus is more comprehensive and dynamic, which made to compare the syllabai of both myself. I found CA (complete) much more dynamic (may be just my personal opinion). One problem is many times ppl just look at CA Inter's syllabus and conclude that ACCA is more comprehensive, things would be altogether different if you look at CA syllabus of all modules. Usman I have to disagree with you.
Undoubtedly CA is tougher of the two.
Don't just look at CA Inter's syllabus isolately, when you combine this with professional syllabus, then CA is perhaps as dynamic as anyother course and much more dynamic than ACCA.
ACCA student may be are performing as good as CA student in firms, some b. comers are also.
I heard it a lot of times that ACCA syllabus is more comprehensive and dynamic, which made to compare the syllabai of both myself. I found CA (complete) much more dynamic (may be just my personal opinion). One problem is many times ppl just look at CA Inter's syllabus and conclude that ACCA is more comprehensive, things would be altogether different if you look at CA syllabus of all modules.
Undoubtedly CA is tougher of the two.
Don't just look at CA Inter's syllabus isolately, when you combine this with professional syllabus, then CA is perhaps as dynamic as any other course and much more dynamic than ACCA.
ACCA student may be are performing as good as CA student in firms, some b. comers are also.
I heard it a lot of times that ACCA syllabus is more comprehensive and dynamic, which made to compare the syllabai of both myself. I found CA (complete) much more dynamic (may be just my personal opinion). One problem is many times ppl just look at CA Inter's syllabus and conclude that ACCA is more comprehensive, things would be altogether different if you look at CA syllabus of all modules. Usman I have to disagree with you.
Undoubtedly CA is tougher of the two.
Don't just look at CA Inter's syllabus isolately, when you combine this with professional syllabus, then CA is perhaps as dynamic as anyother course and much more dynamic than ACCA.
ACCA student may be are performing as good as CA student in firms, some b. comers are also.
I heard it a lot of times that ACCA syllabus is more comprehensive and dynamic, which made to compare the syllabai of both myself. I found CA (complete) much more dynamic (may be just my personal opinion). One problem is many times ppl just look at CA Inter's syllabus and conclude that ACCA is more comprehensive, things would be altogether different if you look at CA syllabus of all modules.
