11-13-2007, 06:23 PM
Dear Amir,
You wrote in ur above post
QUOTE
"beside all i am against them because they took part in elections in the name of ISLAM(it is totally unislamic to take part in elections because we believe in no elections but in KHILAFAT."
UNQUOTE
Firstly, a point to be mentioned (not to fight over it). Your above statement is as per a specific group of muslims. So manys dont find elections as non-islamic act and democratic set-up as a non-islamic set-up. At the same time I dont have to convince you for it similarly you cant do it as well.
Secondly, I would be pleased if you apprise about the way out and methodology you suggest for having Khilafat keeping in view all current issues and un-resolved matters.
Would it be blessed or thrown from the skies all of a sudden or would it be a humanly act to select or elect Khalifa??
What would be the criteria of selection or election of a Khalifa and how one would contest it?
Will every sect has its own Khalifa, if not, how all would be gathered under one flag?
How the next Khalifa would be identified? I think by the noble men or by ex-Khalifa?
If by noble men, then how would be ascertained that bala bala men are noble? This is crucial to be clarified in this era when no one is being considered above the board.
And if by ex-Khalifa, then would this not be a "nasal dar nasal Gaddi Nasheeni?"
This has nothing connectivity with what we oppose or favor. This is just to understand from you.
However, solution should be the one which could be acceptable to general masses (at least muslims ones).
May we be able to learn something from you.
You said
"ISLAMISATION/TALIBANISATION" requires no "HISBA BILL" what it requires only "BLOOD" and "BAROOD" and i can confirm their are very few who can afford to loss their lives..."
I can really express my grief for such mindset. Nothing else I can offer on this statement.
Regards,
Kamran.
You wrote in ur above post
QUOTE
"beside all i am against them because they took part in elections in the name of ISLAM(it is totally unislamic to take part in elections because we believe in no elections but in KHILAFAT."
UNQUOTE
Firstly, a point to be mentioned (not to fight over it). Your above statement is as per a specific group of muslims. So manys dont find elections as non-islamic act and democratic set-up as a non-islamic set-up. At the same time I dont have to convince you for it similarly you cant do it as well.
Secondly, I would be pleased if you apprise about the way out and methodology you suggest for having Khilafat keeping in view all current issues and un-resolved matters.
Would it be blessed or thrown from the skies all of a sudden or would it be a humanly act to select or elect Khalifa??
What would be the criteria of selection or election of a Khalifa and how one would contest it?
Will every sect has its own Khalifa, if not, how all would be gathered under one flag?
How the next Khalifa would be identified? I think by the noble men or by ex-Khalifa?
If by noble men, then how would be ascertained that bala bala men are noble? This is crucial to be clarified in this era when no one is being considered above the board.
And if by ex-Khalifa, then would this not be a "nasal dar nasal Gaddi Nasheeni?"
This has nothing connectivity with what we oppose or favor. This is just to understand from you.
However, solution should be the one which could be acceptable to general masses (at least muslims ones).
May we be able to learn something from you.
You said
"ISLAMISATION/TALIBANISATION" requires no "HISBA BILL" what it requires only "BLOOD" and "BAROOD" and i can confirm their are very few who can afford to loss their lives..."
I can really express my grief for such mindset. Nothing else I can offer on this statement.
Regards,
Kamran.
