11-22-2007, 10:51 PM
@ Astute
That statement was meant for me, and it was not ambiguous atleast nor for me. And I think I didn't deny that rather accept that. But why did you take things for you. CHORR KI DARHI MAIN TINKA
36 runs were required with six wickets in hand and run rate quite under control. Pakistan lost the match by 14 runs, dear it was not against India, it was the final match of previous serious vs SA. But as Kamran said that my logics may have less weightage for you as yours for mine, so I think I can't prove my point by logics. I wonder where he put facts in his theory.
Astute you were of the view that you don't watch cricket as Pakistan's performance is really poor. Poor could have different meaning for you. But I think the facts stated have proved that your statement was totally false. Magar kia karain logics tou sab ke apne hotay hain. And don't compare our team with Kiwis, we are quite better.
That statement was meant for me, and it was not ambiguous atleast nor for me. And I think I didn't deny that rather accept that. But why did you take things for you. CHORR KI DARHI MAIN TINKA
36 runs were required with six wickets in hand and run rate quite under control. Pakistan lost the match by 14 runs, dear it was not against India, it was the final match of previous serious vs SA. But as Kamran said that my logics may have less weightage for you as yours for mine, so I think I can't prove my point by logics. I wonder where he put facts in his theory.
Astute you were of the view that you don't watch cricket as Pakistan's performance is really poor. Poor could have different meaning for you. But I think the facts stated have proved that your statement was totally false. Magar kia karain logics tou sab ke apne hotay hain. And don't compare our team with Kiwis, we are quite better.
