05-29-2003, 04:40 AM
well, I didnt know the heat would turn against MMA, mula folks,, just imagine Moulana diesel our Prime Minister!!!! <img src=icon_smile_big.gif border=0 align=middle>
so u guys seem to be all in favor of whatever 'extra' is being given to our women colleagues.... and 'theone' pointed out that no body shows his concern for the adverse conditions that ladies have to face in the rural areas, I think the proper response to such a problem is to try and improve the conditions in the rural areas then to give extra privilages to the urban ladies, who already r enjoying a nice enough life, should I say. (and doesnt that sound like they r benefiting from the miseries of those poor ladies???) I mean u guys have said so much 'bout giving extra to the ladies in the city, but if u see the 'maids' (masee people) who work at our houses, u know the work environment they work in, and almost all r from rural areas or poor income group, why not give privilages to them (like maternity leave etc)????
further if u notice theres an increased encouragement from companies to employ ladies (and most of it is under pressure from the foreign controlling groups), isnt it suggestive they are trying to change our society??? cause rigt now I think if any class of the society is hit by unemployment that is the male folks (and they can even divert more easily to crimes).. today its a qualification to be a women (as far as seeking a job is concerned) I mean why wouldnt companies keep a 'male receptionist'?? or secretary for that purpose???
so u guys seem to be all in favor of whatever 'extra' is being given to our women colleagues.... and 'theone' pointed out that no body shows his concern for the adverse conditions that ladies have to face in the rural areas, I think the proper response to such a problem is to try and improve the conditions in the rural areas then to give extra privilages to the urban ladies, who already r enjoying a nice enough life, should I say. (and doesnt that sound like they r benefiting from the miseries of those poor ladies???) I mean u guys have said so much 'bout giving extra to the ladies in the city, but if u see the 'maids' (masee people) who work at our houses, u know the work environment they work in, and almost all r from rural areas or poor income group, why not give privilages to them (like maternity leave etc)????
further if u notice theres an increased encouragement from companies to employ ladies (and most of it is under pressure from the foreign controlling groups), isnt it suggestive they are trying to change our society??? cause rigt now I think if any class of the society is hit by unemployment that is the male folks (and they can even divert more easily to crimes).. today its a qualification to be a women (as far as seeking a job is concerned) I mean why wouldnt companies keep a 'male receptionist'?? or secretary for that purpose???
