06-06-2003, 08:42 PM
I hope u've seen the papers, winter and now.
but I've heard them say that winter's paper was much more comprehensive and upto ICAP's standard (not according to theone's standard of ICAP <img src=icon_smile.gif border=0 align=middle> ) and this time they said it was a real lousy paper, didnt cover the grid, and only the first question 'cash flows' was a brainer, and besides they could not see how marks were allocated to questions
Me rulz
but I've heard them say that winter's paper was much more comprehensive and upto ICAP's standard (not according to theone's standard of ICAP <img src=icon_smile.gif border=0 align=middle> ) and this time they said it was a real lousy paper, didnt cover the grid, and only the first question 'cash flows' was a brainer, and besides they could not see how marks were allocated to questions
Me rulz
