01-29-2010, 09:03 PM
Awais
Just checked your e-mail. I did not know what happened on the thread since I did not visit it for some time. Let's see what recourse is available.
I need not to see the visuals again Awais. In fact there was nothing unethical. About one such visual if you will concentrate on the attributes of "unethical" even in Islamic terms, this will not appear like that. In the other where a dog was given a name, it does not become unethical for two reasons. Firstly the name was spelled wrongly and carries no meaning as a result. (This is primary thing). Secondly if it is understood as a specific person, then his own culture does not mind it as unethical at all. Let me tell you, a dog is reverend in their religion. They name their sons as "dog" and they name their dogs on the name of "saints" and "angels". {Naoozbillah}. So measure the things as per applicable standrads then you will find nothing unethical.
We can discusss it further if needed.
Regards,
KAMRAN.
Just checked your e-mail. I did not know what happened on the thread since I did not visit it for some time. Let's see what recourse is available.
I need not to see the visuals again Awais. In fact there was nothing unethical. About one such visual if you will concentrate on the attributes of "unethical" even in Islamic terms, this will not appear like that. In the other where a dog was given a name, it does not become unethical for two reasons. Firstly the name was spelled wrongly and carries no meaning as a result. (This is primary thing). Secondly if it is understood as a specific person, then his own culture does not mind it as unethical at all. Let me tell you, a dog is reverend in their religion. They name their sons as "dog" and they name their dogs on the name of "saints" and "angels". {Naoozbillah}. So measure the things as per applicable standrads then you will find nothing unethical.
We can discusss it further if needed.
Regards,
KAMRAN.
