07-15-2010, 07:37 PM
Is it sensible to rank any qualification of one institute on the basis of extent of exemptions given by other institutes?
The answer to this question will solve all the problems until a new kid comes up a topic âCA or ACCA, which one is bestâ
My answer to the given question is in negative.
For example, if Bangladeshi CA institute do not have policy of giving any exemption to ICAP (of course ICAP donât want exemption from it), should we draw a stupid conclusion that CA of Pakistan is not good as compared to CA of Bangladesh?
Absolutely not
The same is the case here.
Kamran Bhai used the phrase âas a matter of policyâ.
This phase is meaningful if we go at the depth of it.
If ICAP withdraws some exemptions given to ACCA, then it will do so as a matter of policy, not because of ICAP is scared of ACCA or ICAP rank ACCA qualification as low, or whatever.
Then the question is why ICAP will frame and pursue such a policy?
The answer is, as I said before, it because of huge numbers of ACCA students. You all should notice that with the passage of time there is a tremendous increase in ACCA students, and because of this the extent of exemptions is reduced with the passage of time.
ICAP cannot produce same number of members as is produced by ACCA because it is not good for the profession of Chartered Accountancy in Pakistan.
Thatâs why more exemptions will be withdrawn. Only few sensible and realistic ACCA students realize this.
So, unrealistic ACCA students should stop propaganda against ICAP and raise their voice to the ACCA whose only objective to become the worldâs largest institute by size.
The main aim or mission of ICAP is to safeguard the profession of Chartered Accountancy and to keep up the scope of CA in all those places where CAs want to work (not all around the world). Thatâs why the main focus of ICAP, as I said, before, is to get maximum possible exemptions from ICAEW, CICA and ICAA (not every institute of every country) because many ICAP members work there in those countries.
Actually it was intentionally started CA vs ACCA debate and this inko donât want an end of it. I donât think he is a newcomer. He wrote this in two different places and the other place being ACCA vs CA topic of Career Forum.
This inko is comparing CA with ACCA on the basis of UK immigration points.
It is the biggest stupidity of the world to compare two qualifications on the basis of immigration points.
The answer to this question will solve all the problems until a new kid comes up a topic âCA or ACCA, which one is bestâ
My answer to the given question is in negative.
For example, if Bangladeshi CA institute do not have policy of giving any exemption to ICAP (of course ICAP donât want exemption from it), should we draw a stupid conclusion that CA of Pakistan is not good as compared to CA of Bangladesh?
Absolutely not
The same is the case here.
Kamran Bhai used the phrase âas a matter of policyâ.
This phase is meaningful if we go at the depth of it.
If ICAP withdraws some exemptions given to ACCA, then it will do so as a matter of policy, not because of ICAP is scared of ACCA or ICAP rank ACCA qualification as low, or whatever.
Then the question is why ICAP will frame and pursue such a policy?
The answer is, as I said before, it because of huge numbers of ACCA students. You all should notice that with the passage of time there is a tremendous increase in ACCA students, and because of this the extent of exemptions is reduced with the passage of time.
ICAP cannot produce same number of members as is produced by ACCA because it is not good for the profession of Chartered Accountancy in Pakistan.
Thatâs why more exemptions will be withdrawn. Only few sensible and realistic ACCA students realize this.
So, unrealistic ACCA students should stop propaganda against ICAP and raise their voice to the ACCA whose only objective to become the worldâs largest institute by size.
The main aim or mission of ICAP is to safeguard the profession of Chartered Accountancy and to keep up the scope of CA in all those places where CAs want to work (not all around the world). Thatâs why the main focus of ICAP, as I said, before, is to get maximum possible exemptions from ICAEW, CICA and ICAA (not every institute of every country) because many ICAP members work there in those countries.
Actually it was intentionally started CA vs ACCA debate and this inko donât want an end of it. I donât think he is a newcomer. He wrote this in two different places and the other place being ACCA vs CA topic of Career Forum.
This inko is comparing CA with ACCA on the basis of UK immigration points.
It is the biggest stupidity of the world to compare two qualifications on the basis of immigration points.