09-08-2010, 07:55 PM
We should be at least clear on what we say; and if we are not clear we should not try to misdirect any discussion or frame of thought. Every one can, however, disagree to this general rule.
No one humiliated Aamir Liaqat for any personal thing or for the issues he discusses in his program or for his style etc; nor is it a matter of evaluation of some one's personal faith or relationship with Allah, and religious positioning etc. It is also not a discussion on any sect or set of beliefs. We have a habit to transform everything on the lines we wish to look at them or to give the desired meaning, which we wish to.
When a person runs a medical clinic in your street on the basis of a so-called medical qualification; and eventually proves to be a "Quack", the people who rely or have relied on him have a right to question on the act of deceit; and have a social responsibility to inform others as well about his falsified act. Raising of such question does not mean that someone is raising a question on how near he is to Allah, or how good is his personal faith and how nicely and softly he use to speak out. These all things have no attachment with the issue in hand and I believe even a little amount of thought can make the things clear.
Yes, if we visit in our lesser literate areas where such Quacks are found in abundance, and identify some real Quack, we will find many people praising him in similar fashion calling him Messiah etc. They will never feel that legally such person cannot claim what he was doing.
An immoral thing has to remain immoral, regardless of done by whoever; and regardless of whatever relationship such a person has with Allah or human beings and regardless of however he speaks gently and softly. If some forum member doesn't agree with this basic understanding, I am not inclined to debate for the purpose of no gain. I again say, the question discussed in this thread was not initiated by me; I joined it much later; and this question is by no means a keechar on any one's faith or his relationship with Allah. If this is so, then what will you think about the question a Noble Bedouin Muslim raised on Hazrat Umar Bin Khattab R.A. about the two pieces of cloth of which his dress was made? I hope you all would know what Umar R.A. commented about that Bedouin Muslim, even when Bedouinâs observation was proved to be incorrect. He said until the Ummah will be enriched with such people, the Ummah will not be misdirected.
When a person says he is a religious scholar on the basis of a Doctorate; and that doctorate proves to be fictitious, falsified and tool to deceive the others at large, then masses have the right to say wrong as "wrong" and such "wrong" cannot be converted to "right" on the basis of an agricultural thought that "iss doctor say tu buhat jaldi araam aa jata tha".
I believe it is the time for people to learn the reality and speak the truth; we as a nation are already on the verge of destruction for similar immoral acts and supporting of such immoral actors.
I may be totally incorrect as well so in personal capacity I donât mind criticism on my posts at this thread; yet, to my belief and knowledge this is a message for those who can understand the facts on rationale basis.
Regards,
Edited for spelling mistakes.....
No one humiliated Aamir Liaqat for any personal thing or for the issues he discusses in his program or for his style etc; nor is it a matter of evaluation of some one's personal faith or relationship with Allah, and religious positioning etc. It is also not a discussion on any sect or set of beliefs. We have a habit to transform everything on the lines we wish to look at them or to give the desired meaning, which we wish to.
When a person runs a medical clinic in your street on the basis of a so-called medical qualification; and eventually proves to be a "Quack", the people who rely or have relied on him have a right to question on the act of deceit; and have a social responsibility to inform others as well about his falsified act. Raising of such question does not mean that someone is raising a question on how near he is to Allah, or how good is his personal faith and how nicely and softly he use to speak out. These all things have no attachment with the issue in hand and I believe even a little amount of thought can make the things clear.
Yes, if we visit in our lesser literate areas where such Quacks are found in abundance, and identify some real Quack, we will find many people praising him in similar fashion calling him Messiah etc. They will never feel that legally such person cannot claim what he was doing.
An immoral thing has to remain immoral, regardless of done by whoever; and regardless of whatever relationship such a person has with Allah or human beings and regardless of however he speaks gently and softly. If some forum member doesn't agree with this basic understanding, I am not inclined to debate for the purpose of no gain. I again say, the question discussed in this thread was not initiated by me; I joined it much later; and this question is by no means a keechar on any one's faith or his relationship with Allah. If this is so, then what will you think about the question a Noble Bedouin Muslim raised on Hazrat Umar Bin Khattab R.A. about the two pieces of cloth of which his dress was made? I hope you all would know what Umar R.A. commented about that Bedouin Muslim, even when Bedouinâs observation was proved to be incorrect. He said until the Ummah will be enriched with such people, the Ummah will not be misdirected.
When a person says he is a religious scholar on the basis of a Doctorate; and that doctorate proves to be fictitious, falsified and tool to deceive the others at large, then masses have the right to say wrong as "wrong" and such "wrong" cannot be converted to "right" on the basis of an agricultural thought that "iss doctor say tu buhat jaldi araam aa jata tha".
I believe it is the time for people to learn the reality and speak the truth; we as a nation are already on the verge of destruction for similar immoral acts and supporting of such immoral actors.
I may be totally incorrect as well so in personal capacity I donât mind criticism on my posts at this thread; yet, to my belief and knowledge this is a message for those who can understand the facts on rationale basis.
Regards,
Edited for spelling mistakes.....
