09-11-2003, 07:40 AM
), i gone through all postigns of the topic
it seem interesting. but if look at the current discussion of smraza and pervez
<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana" id=quote>quote<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>you are displaying a fundamental lack of understandting of this part of auditing fuction
Then you made a very childish remark<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana" size=2 id=quote>
sorry to say pervez you need to improve your understanding about the topic, and avoid direct attacking by using these kinds of statements.
i was laughing when u said quote the section in which directors of the companies are not autorised to use fund of the co.
<font color=red>A child of the CA field know about the section 195 of C.O. 1984</font id=red>you can enjoy the freedom the expression on this froum, but dont go aggressive. mr smraza nicely answered all the questions raised by you but you always diverted the topic to Multan when it was going to hyderabad <img src=icon_smile_big.gif border=0 align=middle> please dont mind whatever i said. it was my thinkings.
i principally agree with smraza that secp is against the chartered accountant. it must penalize the corrupt auditor and company both at the same time. there should also be a check and balance on both.
it seem interesting. but if look at the current discussion of smraza and pervez
<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana" id=quote>quote<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>you are displaying a fundamental lack of understandting of this part of auditing fuction
Then you made a very childish remark<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana" size=2 id=quote>
sorry to say pervez you need to improve your understanding about the topic, and avoid direct attacking by using these kinds of statements.
i was laughing when u said quote the section in which directors of the companies are not autorised to use fund of the co.
<font color=red>A child of the CA field know about the section 195 of C.O. 1984</font id=red>you can enjoy the freedom the expression on this froum, but dont go aggressive. mr smraza nicely answered all the questions raised by you but you always diverted the topic to Multan when it was going to hyderabad <img src=icon_smile_big.gif border=0 align=middle> please dont mind whatever i said. it was my thinkings.
i principally agree with smraza that secp is against the chartered accountant. it must penalize the corrupt auditor and company both at the same time. there should also be a check and balance on both.