07-23-2003, 03:36 PM
Hi all,
Pervez, if in question paper there are define, explain, and describe etc. it doesnt mean we have to pass the paper by rattafication,
we can give conceptual answers (as we are considered as professionals)
but
unfortunately we have an eduction system which require rattafication than conceptual answers, like in physics or chemistry, if examiner has asked any definition, then we are required to write what exactly the Mr. Newton (marhoom) said.
isnt it foolish, now take the example of CA Tax paper last (oooh result is on 28th) if u have gone throught that papers, some questions was like " what does that section number so & so says??"
yes this requires rattfying, but this is only one or there may be two subjects, remaining all are conceptual papers,
this is another discussion, dont u think we are getting away from the topic?
as far as the "women in accountancy" concerned whenever i ask any lady that why dont she join CA, the answer is almost same"Na baba Na hum say nahi hoga, itna damagh kaun lagaaay?" if u dont agree u can ask any lady around you, (but remember the ladies which i mentioned are genious and shining in their respective fields) some ladies associated this profession with the Men <img src=icon_smile_big.gif border=0 align=middle>
so i think we should try to remain on the topic
and i agree with the statement of Mr. Paki regarding the treatment of ladies in general public
Mr. paki said
"in general public , u r right, but there even, the way the ladies are dressing up these days, they have a major contribution in this abuse."
if i throw a note of Rs.1000/- on the road and expect that nobody will pick it up, it will be foolish on my part
S M R
Edited by - smraza on Jul 23 2003 103912 AM
Pervez, if in question paper there are define, explain, and describe etc. it doesnt mean we have to pass the paper by rattafication,
we can give conceptual answers (as we are considered as professionals)
but
unfortunately we have an eduction system which require rattafication than conceptual answers, like in physics or chemistry, if examiner has asked any definition, then we are required to write what exactly the Mr. Newton (marhoom) said.
isnt it foolish, now take the example of CA Tax paper last (oooh result is on 28th) if u have gone throught that papers, some questions was like " what does that section number so & so says??"
yes this requires rattfying, but this is only one or there may be two subjects, remaining all are conceptual papers,
this is another discussion, dont u think we are getting away from the topic?
as far as the "women in accountancy" concerned whenever i ask any lady that why dont she join CA, the answer is almost same"Na baba Na hum say nahi hoga, itna damagh kaun lagaaay?" if u dont agree u can ask any lady around you, (but remember the ladies which i mentioned are genious and shining in their respective fields) some ladies associated this profession with the Men <img src=icon_smile_big.gif border=0 align=middle>
so i think we should try to remain on the topic
and i agree with the statement of Mr. Paki regarding the treatment of ladies in general public
Mr. paki said
"in general public , u r right, but there even, the way the ladies are dressing up these days, they have a major contribution in this abuse."
if i throw a note of Rs.1000/- on the road and expect that nobody will pick it up, it will be foolish on my part
S M R
Edited by - smraza on Jul 23 2003 103912 AM