03-30-2009, 09:08 AM
Dears
Thanks for proving "Sardar" level of "mentality" and reflecting actual inner "Sardar" personality by writing such words. Congratulate on achieving such unparallel level. Though no-one would like to share such a level. Readers can decide themselves whether such words reflect "sane" or "no sane" state of mind and professionalism of writer. I leave it on readers' discretion.[)]
After first open threat in previous posts, now we see another open threat to see consequences "onward from now on" and order to keep "mouth shut". Some posters are really writing more and more words without thinking. Perhaps this is their sheer example of "hat dharmi". They think other members would go by their orders.[)]
OOO... I am really SCARED...Guys I have no place to hide now...O my God, what should I do. Raham Jahan Panah Raham...By the way, Jahan Panah agar "mushla maar hi gaya" hay to issay qobool karlain aur forum ki jan bakhshi karain...[D][D][D]
Dear readers; by the way, there are some interesting points to consider. The article was copy/pasted on âPosted - Mar 19 2009 40258 PMâ post and its weblink was provided on âEdited by - kamranACA on Mar 26 2009 10141 PMâ. This is the same date when this poster very first time disclosed the claim that he has got the permission. By the post of March 26, he says, âPosted - Mar 26 2009 11443 PM I now think it expedient to let the members know that I have all the required permissions to quote the article of Dr. Curt Richebacher on any professional forum... If some fellow carries any misconception, he can confirm it directly from the concerned organization of Dr. Richebacher.â Then in the post of March 28 he says, âPosted - Mar 28 2009 14803 PM â...doing so would be another un-ethical effortâ. So, the questions are, what he was doing between March 19 to March 26? Why he did not say anything about the permission? Has he any permission on March 19 when he copy/pasted the article? On March 26, he very first time disclosed that he now has permission, and anyone can see the permission. But then on March 28 he says it would be un-ethical effort if someone does see permission.
Really interesting contradictions in actions and statements. [)]
Regards
Thanks for proving "Sardar" level of "mentality" and reflecting actual inner "Sardar" personality by writing such words. Congratulate on achieving such unparallel level. Though no-one would like to share such a level. Readers can decide themselves whether such words reflect "sane" or "no sane" state of mind and professionalism of writer. I leave it on readers' discretion.[)]
After first open threat in previous posts, now we see another open threat to see consequences "onward from now on" and order to keep "mouth shut". Some posters are really writing more and more words without thinking. Perhaps this is their sheer example of "hat dharmi". They think other members would go by their orders.[)]
OOO... I am really SCARED...Guys I have no place to hide now...O my God, what should I do. Raham Jahan Panah Raham...By the way, Jahan Panah agar "mushla maar hi gaya" hay to issay qobool karlain aur forum ki jan bakhshi karain...[D][D][D]
Dear readers; by the way, there are some interesting points to consider. The article was copy/pasted on âPosted - Mar 19 2009 40258 PMâ post and its weblink was provided on âEdited by - kamranACA on Mar 26 2009 10141 PMâ. This is the same date when this poster very first time disclosed the claim that he has got the permission. By the post of March 26, he says, âPosted - Mar 26 2009 11443 PM I now think it expedient to let the members know that I have all the required permissions to quote the article of Dr. Curt Richebacher on any professional forum... If some fellow carries any misconception, he can confirm it directly from the concerned organization of Dr. Richebacher.â Then in the post of March 28 he says, âPosted - Mar 28 2009 14803 PM â...doing so would be another un-ethical effortâ. So, the questions are, what he was doing between March 19 to March 26? Why he did not say anything about the permission? Has he any permission on March 19 when he copy/pasted the article? On March 26, he very first time disclosed that he now has permission, and anyone can see the permission. But then on March 28 he says it would be un-ethical effort if someone does see permission.
Really interesting contradictions in actions and statements. [)]
Regards