08-03-2004, 01:20 AM
<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial" id=quote>quote<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>
there is a draw-back, if cudn't get into any insurance company, all ur qualification and hard work is wasted ( in case of bad job market in future)
<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial" size=2 id=quote>
Certainly not true!! Infact there are circa 20k Qualified Actuaries in World and the unemployed percentage would be very very small - even that small that you may ignore it.
Also, you don't qualify (from most of the Institutes/Societies) until unless you don't have atleast 3 years of experience, which can only be gained while working for an Actuarial Employer. So it doesn't make any sense at all that an employer would make you redundant after investing his resources on your development.
DT
there is a draw-back, if cudn't get into any insurance company, all ur qualification and hard work is wasted ( in case of bad job market in future)
<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial" size=2 id=quote>
Certainly not true!! Infact there are circa 20k Qualified Actuaries in World and the unemployed percentage would be very very small - even that small that you may ignore it.
Also, you don't qualify (from most of the Institutes/Societies) until unless you don't have atleast 3 years of experience, which can only be gained while working for an Actuarial Employer. So it doesn't make any sense at all that an employer would make you redundant after investing his resources on your development.
DT
