03-31-2004, 02:46 PM
<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial" id=quote>quote<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>I totally agree with sumaan that you can score more easily in written exam because you are given marks for working not just for answer why in CBE's the answers are fized in computers so that you mark it if that computer has in it's check bank it will correct it otherwise mark it wrong. So difficult to score. While preparation for both the type takes almost same time and same studies but pattern for preparing is different as there are some questions which can be asked in written but not in CBE. I think good teachers for these papers are Naveed Bukhari and Safdar Mithani.<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial" size=2 id=quote>
In my opinion CBE is better than the handwritten exam, bcaz the objective of most of the students is to clear the exams and MCQs based exams are easy to clear if your concepts are strong, even you can take advantage of "Tukka", if there is no negative marking, but in handwritten exam you can not take advantage of tukka if u dont understand the question, as u will have to attempt the whole question. and in written exams the no of questions are less with high marks per question but in MCQs there are lot of questions with minimum marks say one or two, so it is quiet easy to go for CBE.
SMR
In my opinion CBE is better than the handwritten exam, bcaz the objective of most of the students is to clear the exams and MCQs based exams are easy to clear if your concepts are strong, even you can take advantage of "Tukka", if there is no negative marking, but in handwritten exam you can not take advantage of tukka if u dont understand the question, as u will have to attempt the whole question. and in written exams the no of questions are less with high marks per question but in MCQs there are lot of questions with minimum marks say one or two, so it is quiet easy to go for CBE.
SMR
