Accountancy Forum
  • Accountancy
  • Forum Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search
Accountancy Forum General General Discussion v
« Previous 1 … 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 … 39 Next »
removal of directors sec 178

 
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
removal of directors sec 178
fatima ca
Offline

Junior Member

Posts: 43
Threads: 5
Joined: Mar 2006
Reputation: 0
#1
03-04-2006, 06:22 AM
hi[)]
its fatima doing CA in module D.
i got a problem[?] in company law plz any one help me.any one who is good at company law plz tell me how to calculate the number of votes for removal of director of casual vacancy.

hmm
fatima ca
Offline

Junior Member

Posts: 43
Threads: 5
Joined: Mar 2006
Reputation: 0
#2
03-06-2006, 01:57 AM
thanx Saif 4 ur kind info. but my problem starts 4om this point that if number of votes required for removal= total number of votes/no of directors . then no of directors are the remaining ones after deducting the removed one or he is included???????????????????????becoz section stated that no of directors for the time being????????

hmm
Ali Akbar
Offline

Senior Member

Posts: 429
Threads: 21
Joined: Oct 2004
Reputation: 0
#3
03-06-2006, 03:48 AM
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by fatima ca</i>
<br />thanx Saif 4 ur kind info. but my problem starts 4om this point that if number of votes required for removal= total number of votes/no of directors . then no of directors are the remaining ones after deducting the removed one or he is included???????????????????????becoz section stated that no of directors for the time being????????

hmm
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">


Hi

for the time being means he is included, becoz he is not yet removed while calculating the number of votes required...its quite logical!!!!

ICAPians, the unparalleled
fatima ca
Offline

Junior Member

Posts: 43
Threads: 5
Joined: Mar 2006
Reputation: 0
#4
03-06-2006, 05:29 AM
thanx ali akbar
but problem is " no of votes is equal to the product of no of shares and no of directors." as per sec 178, for example
let no of shares are 100 and no of directors are 5 so no of votes =100*5=500
then in the next step as in sec 181(ii) no of votes are divided by the same no of directors so result is same as 500/5=100. so wat is need to do such a long calculation, sec should state that votes are no of shares?????????????/
plz solve my confusion.plzzzzzzzzzzzzz


hmm
Ali Akbar
Offline

Senior Member

Posts: 429
Threads: 21
Joined: Oct 2004
Reputation: 0
#5
03-06-2006, 02:01 PM
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by fatima ca</i>
<br />thanx ali akbar
but problem is " no of votes is equal to the product of no of shares and no of directors." as per sec 178, for example
let no of shares are 100 and no of directors are 5 so no of votes =100*5=500
then in the next step as in sec 181(ii) no of votes are divided by the same no of directors so result is same as 500/5=100. so wat is need to do such a long calculation, sec should state that votes are no of shares?????????????/
plz solve my confusion.plzzzzzzzzzzzzz


hmm
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">


hi

It is worth mentioning that if the votes (i.e 100 or more in ur example) cast against the resolution (i.e in favour of director) then director shall not be deemed to be removed. so it means that there is no need to cast votes for the removal of director. if no vote is casted in the favour of director, then he shall be deemed to be removed.

ICAPians, the unparalleled..
fatima ca
Offline

Junior Member

Posts: 43
Threads: 5
Joined: Mar 2006
Reputation: 0
#6
03-07-2006, 12:30 AM
thanx Ali Akbar thanx 22222222 much


hmm
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread
Forum Jump:

© 2002-2024 Accountancy. Copyrights of all content on this web site are owned by Accountancy except where indicated in source or copyright statements. Accountancy must be contacted for permission to copy or redistribute any material published on this website.

Linear Mode
Threaded Mode