09-10-2011, 05:54 PM
@ ShahidACCA
You again proved your failure of getting hold to what you are explained. "Whenever someone rushes in, appropriate barriers are raised". I just laughed on the conclusion you derived out of this sentence. Kahaan parhtay rahey ho bhaai? Are you really an ACCA or just use this designation like one of our best examples of ACCAs (moroneflower) who had been using it since 2006 while he passed through in Dec 2008? Or is there some cover of bias on your eyes? Why all the stuff like you takes the things this way. This sentence about "barriers" was merely about the treatment given to ACCA by ICAP before and after 2002. Donât get wrong meaning from "treatment". I mean it is about the exemptions; and raising barriers or relaxing the requirements is always a matter of policy and depends upon the specific circumstances. It had and has nothing to do with exam policy or 50% marks policy which you have tried to deduce for your own purpose. Is there any problem with you which leads you to mis-interpret the things? Rest assured I will not let you do that, so far I am here and so far I donât lay you off. If you feel that this changed scenario for exemptions to ACCAs is resulting in reduced membership of ICAP, then let it be. ) We are happy with it. Why are you concerned, specially when you have nothing to do with us? ) This is what I call as crying for the missed train by people like you.
As far as ACCA as a designation is concerned, I have never been against it. I appreciate all those who take their decision, stick with it and donât shift the burden of their decision on the shoulders of others. No one of you can prove that I am against ACCA; rather, I only criticize and reply the shifting of burden of the decision on our shoulders. Do ACCA, and own whatever good (or even bad) you get out of it. Who I am to say otherwise? But donât blame us for anything happening against your expectations. Yes, if someone asks me about the merits and demerits of each designation, I will definitely tell him what I know and what I faithfully believe. Why I said, "we have given you a place to exist", is being replied shortly.
Babas are even Babas for us, as they are too senior; but we have fullest regard and respect for them, and for their contribution to the profession and the country. They were capable and have ever produced the capable people as their followers, and this is not something to be certified by the crying stuff like you. This is what the entire world has recognized. You simply are not aware of it due to your handicapped knowledge base. The people like PWC, KMG, Peat Marwick, KPMG, Ernst and Whiney, Ernst and Young, Arthur Anderson, GT, Baker & Tilly, RSM, Praxity etc have ever found these Babas much better than the crying stuff, so you better look towards your forefathers if there is some question in your mind. Do you feel all these bigger names are not aware of what Ethics and Social Responsibility entails? Are you a joker? Owing to your tiny thought, you better watch your "future" than getting curious and concerned about our "history" because in doing so you will face your destined failure of understanding the things properly. This may alleviate your problems and confusions. Again a suggestion and not an advice. How those Babas became ICAP members is what I am gonna reply to ausmanpk, though it has been explained earlier as well, and has found the same result which is specific in case of people like you.
Last paragraph of your latest post is too dubious. You said
â¦â¦â¦â¦"Please will you tell us that what ACCA stand for? it is stand for Association of Chartered Certified Accountants. but what you explained in ACCA Pakistan forum?"â¦â¦..
I donât at all know this ACCA Pakistan Forum, so let me know what you meant by writing the above lines. ACCA is definitely meant for the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants, and as a designation, for its members, which has also been mentioned by you with your name. What you wanted to say, needs to be explained, if you desire an answer.
Regards,
