Former Ernst & Young partner arrested
Published on 9/26/2003
A former partner with Ernst & Young was arrested yesterday and charged with
obstructing a federal investigation of one of his clients by altering and
destroying documents that were relevant to the inquiry.
The former partner, Thomas Trauger, who worked in Ernst & Young's office in San
Francisco, was charged in a criminal complaint with destroying and altering
audit work papers related to a federal examination of the bank subsidiary of
NextCard Inc., a consumer loan company that is being liquidated.
According to the criminal complaint and related actions brought yesterday by the
Securities and Exchange Commission, Mr. Trauger was assisted in the effort by
Oliver Flanagan, a former Ernst & Young senior manager, and Michael Mullen, a
former audit manager. Mr. Mullen, 33, was not charged in the criminal case. Mr.
Flanagan, 34, entered a guilty plea last month, but that plea remained under
seal until yesterday.
A lawyer for Mr. Trauger, Ed Swanson, said that his client planned to fight the
charges. "We are confident that he will be exonerated," Mr. Swanson said.
Stanley Arkin, a lawyer for Mr. Flanagan, said that his client, who is
cooperating in the case, now lives in Ireland. "He has made his peace with our
government," Mr. Arkin said. "And he only wishes that Mr. Trauber had been a
better mentor."
A lawyer for Mr. Mullen, Bob Breakstone, said that his client was "dismayed" by
the S.E.C. action but hoped to work out a resolution of the matter.
The criminal charges are among the first to be brought against an accountant
under provisions in the Sarbanes-Oxley Act related to the destruction of
documents. That law was adopted in 2002 in response to an array of corporate
scandals, including an obstruction of justice case against Arthur Andersen
accountants in the investigation of the collapse of Enron.
Indeed, according to the criminal complaint, the efforts by Ernst & Young
accountants to eliminate certain details from their work papers about NextCard
began in November 2001 — the same month that Andersen accountants were shredding
Enron records. According to the complaint, the obstruction effort at Ernst
continued into 2002, even as criminal charges were being brought in the Andersen
case. Andersen ultimately collapsed after it was convicted of obstruction.
Prosecutors hailed the action yesterday, saying that it was a significant moment
in the government's effort to combat white-collar crime because of its use of
Sarbanes-Oxley.
"This is a bellwether day," Robert McCallum, acting deputy attorney general,
said of the case in a statement, adding that the case "should remind accountants
and lawyers not only of their commitment to represent their clients
professionally, but also of our strong commitment to enforcing the law."
Kevin V. Ryan, the United States attorney in San Francisco, said the case
underscored the importance of professional standards to the nation's financial
system.
"Financial markets depend on the integrity of auditors, lawyers and
professionals to do their jobs ethically and fairly," Mr. Ryan said in a
statement. "Where they fail to do so because of negligence, markets are
compromised. Where they fail to do so because of criminal intent, all of us are
at risk."
Ernst & Young said in a statement that it began an internal investigation as
soon as it became aware of what it called "a clear and serious violation" of the
firm's standards.
The firm is cooperating with the government investigation, it said, and has
"provided the government with full and unfettered access to our people and
records to assist in its own investigation of the matter," the statement said.
At the center of the accusations against Mr. Trauger is NextCard, a company that
was once the largest issuer of credit cards over the Internet. But the company
was cited by federal bank regulators for using improper assumptions to identify
credit quality problems, and last November it filed for bankruptcy protection.
The investigation by bank regulators with the Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency had already been under way for several months by November 2001 when the
Ernst auditors began an effort to revise work papers on NextCard, the criminal
complaint says.
Beginning in early 2000, the complaint says, NextCard began reclassifying losses
attributable to nonpayment of bills by customers who were poor credit risks,
categorizing the losses as fraudulent use of the credit cards. Bills that go
unpaid have to be written off eventually as uncollectible; the larger the
percentage of such bills, the greater the amount a financial institution must
reserve as an allowance for loan losses.
Courtesy of New York Times



