Accountancy Forum
  • Accountancy
  • Forum Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search
Accountancy Forum The Profession Firms v
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 … 19 Next »
Ernst and Young Ford Rhodes Sidat Hyder

 
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
Ernst and Young Ford Rhodes Sidat Hyder
Dard
Offline

Posting Freak

Posts: 876
Threads: 23
Joined: Jan 2010
Reputation: 0
#106
03-25-2011, 01:25 AM
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, san" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by arsalan7</i>
<br /><blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, san" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by shayanshonu</i>
<br /><blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, san" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by arsalan7</i>
<br />i dont remember the question but i think it was 16(96)12 and 10(?)15 .. and i think the answer was 75 cuz (16 x 12)/2 = 96 and (10 x 15)/2 = 75
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">yeah it was 12 i mistakenly wrote 13..thanks for the ans..what about the other one 65 35 17 ?
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">

unfortunately i ran out of time else my ans wud have been 3 because
(square of 2) - 1 = 3
(square of 4) + 1 = 17
(square of 6) - 1 = 35
(square of 8) + 1 = 65
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
How can one figure this out in 1minute?
arsalan7
Offline

Junior Member

Posts: 40
Threads: 1
Joined: Jul 2010
Reputation: 0
#107
03-25-2011, 01:41 AM
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, san" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Dard</i>
<br /><blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, san" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by arsalan7</i>
<br /><blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, san" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by shayanshonu</i>
<br /><blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, san" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by arsalan7</i>
<br />i dont remember the question but i think it was 16(96)12 and 10(?)15 .. and i think the answer was 75 cuz (16 x 12)/2 = 96 and (10 x 15)/2 = 75
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">yeah it was 12 i mistakenly wrote 13..thanks for the ans..what about the other one 65 35 17 ?
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">

unfortunately i ran out of time else my ans wud have been 3 because
(square of 2) - 1 = 3
(square of 4) + 1 = 17
(square of 6) - 1 = 35
(square of 8) + 1 = 65
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
How can one figure this out in 1minute?
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
yea its difficult but rem sequences usually involve + - x / and square cube n square root cuberoot.. so its not that difficult but i hope they just need a pass in their test..shoot man its so scary
Dard
Offline

Posting Freak

Posts: 876
Threads: 23
Joined: Jan 2010
Reputation: 0
#108
03-25-2011, 02:57 AM
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, san" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by arsalan7</i>
<br /><blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, san" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Dard</i>
<br />I am not good at sequences, but i tried. 65/2= 32.5, the second number is 2.5 more than 32.5(ie. 35). 35/2= 17.5, the third number is 0.5 less than 17.5(ie 17). So the sequence is a, b=a/2+2.5, c=b/2-0.5, d=c/2+2.5, e=d/2-0.5 and so on. Therefore the fourth number is 17/2+2.5= 11.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
ur right ur not gud at sequences p
im kiddin but i think 75 is the correct ans.. u disagree with my calculation?
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
My solution wasn't that bad, atleast i tried. Yeah, i am not good at sequences. I would leave that sequence question for the last. I just hope i get a call for the test, atleast.
Dard
Offline

Posting Freak

Posts: 876
Threads: 23
Joined: Jan 2010
Reputation: 0
#109
03-25-2011, 02:59 AM
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, san" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by fslcv</i>
<br />I made blunder in the test, now thinking of forgeting about the idea of audit cauz I wont ever get selected.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
Don't lose hope and demotivate yourself. Work hard.
arsenal.gooner
Offline

Senior Member

Posts: 357
Threads: 11
Joined: Oct 2009
Reputation: 0
#110
03-25-2011, 03:17 AM
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, san" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by fslcv</i>
<br />I made blunder in the test, now thinking of forgeting about the idea of audit cauz I wont ever get selected.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">

waqt ka muqaabla sakht tha and therefore im sure that there would be a lot of people who would have made quite a few blunders in the test.. so u still stand as good a chance to receive an interview call as anyone else out there..

Rgds
shayanshonu
Offline

Junior Member

Posts: 5
Threads: 0
Joined: Mar 2011
Reputation: 0
#111
03-25-2011, 06:11 AM
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, san" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Dard</i>
<br />I am not good at sequences, but i tried. 65/2= 32.5, the second number is 2.5 more than 32.5(ie. 35). 35/2= 17.5, the third number is 0.5 less than 17.5(ie 17). So the sequence is a, b=a/2+2.5, c=b/2-0.5, d=c/2+2.5, e=d/2-0.5 and so on. Therefore the fourth number is 17/2+2.5= 11.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
this justification would be correct if there were 5 numbers..any ways i also wrote 11 p but it was just a guess no calculation lol
Dard
Offline

Posting Freak

Posts: 876
Threads: 23
Joined: Jan 2010
Reputation: 0
#112
03-25-2011, 04:51 PM
What if there were 5 numbers?
arsalan7
Offline

Junior Member

Posts: 40
Threads: 1
Joined: Jul 2010
Reputation: 0
#113
03-25-2011, 09:41 PM
ofcourse i was kiddin @dard
and did anyone receive interview call?
arsenal.gooner
Offline

Senior Member

Posts: 357
Threads: 11
Joined: Oct 2009
Reputation: 0
#114
03-29-2011, 04:02 AM
guyz... so far only CA students (first attempt) have rcvd interview calls..
if any of you ACCA guyz receive a call, let the forum know..
Dard
Offline

Posting Freak

Posts: 876
Threads: 23
Joined: Jan 2010
Reputation: 0
#115
03-29-2011, 06:10 AM
Recieved a call for what? Interview at FRSH karachi?
arsenal.gooner
Offline

Senior Member

Posts: 357
Threads: 11
Joined: Oct 2009
Reputation: 0
#116
03-29-2011, 06:23 AM
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, san" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Dard</i>
<br />Recieved a call for what? Interview at FRSH karachi?
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">

yes dard
Dard
Offline

Posting Freak

Posts: 876
Threads: 23
Joined: Jan 2010
Reputation: 0
#117
03-29-2011, 06:59 AM
You changed your post. Now my question looks stupid. Please try not to edit posts after a reply has been posted.
arsenal.gooner
Offline

Senior Member

Posts: 357
Threads: 11
Joined: Oct 2009
Reputation: 0
#118
03-29-2011, 06:58 PM
dard,
you are right. i have undone my editing.. now your question doesnt look stupid anymore..
fslcv
Offline

Junior Member

Posts: 29
Threads: 2
Joined: Mar 2011
Reputation: 0
#119
03-30-2011, 05:10 PM
so not even single ACCA received a call yet...amazing
omertkhan
Offline

Junior Member

Posts: 5
Threads: 0
Joined: Mar 2011
Reputation: 0
#120
03-31-2011, 04:21 AM
Ok, so I got an interview call today which is weird because my test went really horrible. The guy told me to bring my original documents and report at the office at 415
I wasn't expecting the call at all because as I said my test went really really bad. Anyway lets see what happens tomorrow. Maybe they're calling me just to make fun of me or something like that. I'm a CA student btw (fts 1).
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Pages (12): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread
Forum Jump:

© 2002-2024 Accountancy. Copyrights of all content on this web site are owned by Accountancy except where indicated in source or copyright statements. Accountancy must be contacted for permission to copy or redistribute any material published on this website.

Linear Mode
Threaded Mode