06-06-2005, 07:44 AM
DT i think u r wrong about lse being better than cass for Actuarial it is a widely known fact cass of city uni of london and wharton of U Penn are the two best places on the face of this earth for actuarial sci. cass has the largest faculty in risk managment actuarial sci and insurance in entire europe. not to mention the highest no of Fellows of IOA in it faculty. the highest employability rates the best relations with the industy and the IOA the oldest dept for actuarial sci in the country (30 years) if u just look at the modules and their syllabus, cass gives to its students u would simply realise that lse is about a decade behind to come up with the faculty and dept capable of providing students with such modules. Inside Careers one of the biggest Actuarial recruiters doesnt even aknowledge lse as a course provider for Actuarial Science, but tell u what it does recognize cass and it even recognizes heriot watt and kent. if it was anyother subject that u would have claimed lse to be better at that cetainly would have been true but when it comes down to actuarial the only place i think better than Cass is U penn's wharton.
