05-14-2007, 06:26 PM
Dear Amir,
I wish not to reply ur posts some times but the circumstances make it compulsory for me to clarify some issues.
It has been true in so many cases in the history still, I do not crudely agree to the statement that Haq has always faced troubles and has lots of Enemies.....where as Batil always has no enemy and faces no troubles.
In my view whenever Haq was in power (or the representatives of Haq) it unfortunately did the same things and exercised its powers in the same fashion as it is done by others or is expected to be done by others. This has always heppened in history.
When we destroy the Idols of others like we did in the era of Mehmood Ghaznavi, then why we should not expect it for us when others would be in power. Penetrating someone else's country and first of all destroying the worship places of inhabitants is questionable. We have done this all and we admire it extremely. Then why we object such acts of others. Naoozbillah I am not supporting any act done by Kuffaar but I am only explaining that whenever Muslims were in power they did the same things as others are expected to do.
In my view, HAQ and BATIL both are enemies of each other. Further, every one in his/her own thought is Haq and in others' thought Batil. Both are attackers and defendents at the same time. Innocency only rests with those who are not in power.
I feel that whoever was or is in power did not/does not do well. We have to study the history from both angles.
Regards,
Kamran.
I wish not to reply ur posts some times but the circumstances make it compulsory for me to clarify some issues.
It has been true in so many cases in the history still, I do not crudely agree to the statement that Haq has always faced troubles and has lots of Enemies.....where as Batil always has no enemy and faces no troubles.
In my view whenever Haq was in power (or the representatives of Haq) it unfortunately did the same things and exercised its powers in the same fashion as it is done by others or is expected to be done by others. This has always heppened in history.
When we destroy the Idols of others like we did in the era of Mehmood Ghaznavi, then why we should not expect it for us when others would be in power. Penetrating someone else's country and first of all destroying the worship places of inhabitants is questionable. We have done this all and we admire it extremely. Then why we object such acts of others. Naoozbillah I am not supporting any act done by Kuffaar but I am only explaining that whenever Muslims were in power they did the same things as others are expected to do.
In my view, HAQ and BATIL both are enemies of each other. Further, every one in his/her own thought is Haq and in others' thought Batil. Both are attackers and defendents at the same time. Innocency only rests with those who are not in power.
I feel that whoever was or is in power did not/does not do well. We have to study the history from both angles.
Regards,
Kamran.