05-28-2006, 08:11 AM
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Ali Akbar</i>
<br /><blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Pracs</i>
<br /><blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by maani</i>
<br />A.F.F
KMPG(THK)
Ford Rhodes
MYASCO.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
Should it not be
AFF
FRSH
THK
MYASCO
I means as per recent discussions on another thread here.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
I cant understand on what basis are you placing FRSH on number 2 in Pakistan? As I said in another thread also that vague info doesnt work here! If you don't know the current conditions in Pakistan then please dont use the outdated or international ranking for PAkistan.!
If you are ranking the firms on the basis of clients then for sure KPMG is on number one now and AFF at 2!!
And for your kind information its not THK its KPMG Taseer Hadi (KTH)
ICAPians, the unparalleled..
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
Ali,..
It seems you are going to be a partner at THK....!! well good luck in your quest. So is your ranking based on actual revenue figures!!! can you let us have some figures in that case.
I may not be in Pakistan for some years but this forum is not the only source of information I have about Pakistan. I have no axe to grind (like your self,, I am sure you are a THK trainee) since I am not employed by any of these firms in Pakistan.
I think you have read my reasons for placing FRSH at no.2 on this other thread,.. is that why your paranoia hit the ceiling because you cannot take logic in its stride. Hang in there buddy and take it easy. Before you shout at the top of your lungs,, bring back some figures here... say the number of trainees THK has,. perhaps that is some thing we can bench mark.. fair enough !!
Bring is some facts and convince me, other wise I don't see why we should consider as KPMG at no.1
<br /><blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Pracs</i>
<br /><blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial" id="quote">quote<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by maani</i>
<br />A.F.F
KMPG(THK)
Ford Rhodes
MYASCO.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
Should it not be
AFF
FRSH
THK
MYASCO
I means as per recent discussions on another thread here.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
I cant understand on what basis are you placing FRSH on number 2 in Pakistan? As I said in another thread also that vague info doesnt work here! If you don't know the current conditions in Pakistan then please dont use the outdated or international ranking for PAkistan.!
If you are ranking the firms on the basis of clients then for sure KPMG is on number one now and AFF at 2!!
And for your kind information its not THK its KPMG Taseer Hadi (KTH)
ICAPians, the unparalleled..
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
Ali,..
It seems you are going to be a partner at THK....!! well good luck in your quest. So is your ranking based on actual revenue figures!!! can you let us have some figures in that case.
I may not be in Pakistan for some years but this forum is not the only source of information I have about Pakistan. I have no axe to grind (like your self,, I am sure you are a THK trainee) since I am not employed by any of these firms in Pakistan.
I think you have read my reasons for placing FRSH at no.2 on this other thread,.. is that why your paranoia hit the ceiling because you cannot take logic in its stride. Hang in there buddy and take it easy. Before you shout at the top of your lungs,, bring back some figures here... say the number of trainees THK has,. perhaps that is some thing we can bench mark.. fair enough !!
Bring is some facts and convince me, other wise I don't see why we should consider as KPMG at no.1